When Should a Reviewer Decline an Invitation to Review an Article With Plos One Journal
Important data virtually reviewing for PLOS Biological science
PLOS Biology is transitioning from Aperta™ to the Editorial Director submission organization. Submit your comments using the link to the submission system mentioned in the invitation letter.
Signing In
You must accept a PLOS account to access Aperta. You only need one account to access all of your manuscripts in Aperta, whether you are an author, reviewer, or Editorial Board member.
Existing accounts
If y'all have previously used a PLOS account to annotate on published articles on the PLOS journal websites or to sign upwardly for eTOC alerts, y'all will utilize the same credentials to access Aperta. You lot may also have a PLOS account if yous have served every bit an Editorial Board Member.
Go to the Aperta homepage and click Sign in with PLOS.
Enter your credentials on the PLOS sign-in screen to access the arrangement. If you need to recover your password, click theForgot your password link to have reset instructions emailed to you lot.
New accounts
To set up a new PLOS account, go to the Aperta homepage and click Create an business relationship.
On the side by side screen, fill out the course with your contact information and countersign. Then click Create Account.
When you submit the form, yous will receive a confirmation electronic mail from plos.org with a link to verify your account. Click the link in the confirmation email to complete your business relationship registration. You will and then exist redirected to the sign-in folio. Click Sign in with PLOS and enter your new credentials.
Please do non create more than than i account for yourself. To change your email address, affiliation, or other details, sign in to to your account and edit the data.
If you are having problem accessing your account, try resetting your countersign. For further aid, email the journal.
Your Aperta Contour
Your Contour in Aperta displays your account information. To access your Contour, click on your proper noun in the upper right-hand corner of your screen and select Profile in the dropdown menu.
The Profile includes a push to connect or create an ORCID iD. This opens a popup window where y'all can enter your ORCID information or register for a new ORCID iD.
PLOS requires that all corresponding authors provide an ORCID iD when submitting a manuscript, and nosotros encourage anybody participating in the peer review process to have 1. Learn more almost ORCID at PLOS. For more than information most how to fix your ORCID iD in Aperta, lookout this short video.
Reviewer Invitations
When y'all are asked to evaluate a manuscript submitted to PLOS Biology, you will receive an invitation via e-mail. Your invitation will include the manuscript title, abstract, and author listing, including author affiliations. Click the links in the email to accept or pass up the invitation.
Accessing Aperta
If you do non accept a PLOS account when you are invited to review a manuscript, you will exist prompted to create i when yous accept the assignment. On the account registration screen, enter your name and a password. Then click Create Business relationship to go on to view the manuscript.
If you are signed in to Aperta, y'all tin can access your invitations directly from Your Manuscripts by clicking the greenView Invitations button.
ClickingView Invitations opens a new screen with the championship, abstract, and writer list of the manuscript you lot accept been invited to evaluate. Utilise the buttons to accept or decline the invitation.
If you decline the invitation, you lot volition be prompted to provide a reason for failing and to suggest alternating reviewers for the manuscript. This feedback is valuable to us so nosotros encourage you to provide as much information as possible.
If you take the invitation, you will automatically be redirected to the manuscript.
Reviewer competing interests
You should not accept an invitation if you accept any academic, financial, or personal competing interests. Read our total policy on competing interests. The reviewer invitation includes author information (including institutions) to help y'all with your decision. If y'all are unsure if your state of affairs constitutes a competing interest, please email the journal.
Review timeline
Typically, the due engagement is 10 days from the date of accepting the invitation. You can observe the due date on the Review card or in the e-mail that you received confirming the assignment. You do not need to submit the review by a certain time on the due date, even if you come across a time indicated with the assignment. If you demand more time to complete your review, please electronic mail the periodical.
Viewing Your Assignments
When you view the submission y'all are assigned to review, the manuscript text volition appear on the left-hand side of the screen. Information about the submission, such as the writer list, data availability statement, or additional materials, will appear on the right equally a listing of cards. Click a card title to expand the card and view the contents.
At the height of the list is a Review card with your name on it. This is where you will enter your comments.
Yous can also utilize the Downloads button in the navigation bar to download electric current and prior versions of the uploaded manuscript.
Note that some PDFs of Word files may contain conversion errors. If yous suspect a conversion error, refer to the Discussion file.
Yous tin render to your assignments at whatever time past clicking Your Manuscripts at the superlative of the window.
Submitting Your Review
The Review menu asks yous to provide the following information:
- Recommend a determination.
- Declare any potentialcompeting interests.
- If you wish for your identity to exist revealed to the authors, include your name. PLOS encourages transparency in the review process.
- Include comments for the authors. For research manufactures, comment on the quality of the statistical analysis and whether the manuscript adheres to standards for information availability. For mag articles, comment on the quality of any unpublished data that is included and whether information technology supports the conclusions.
- Include additional confidential comments for the editor, such every bit concerns virtually dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics.
- If the manuscript is not suitable for publication inPLOS Biology, comment on whether information technology might be suitable for publication in another PLOS journal (specify which journal), and indicate whether you would be willing to keep there every bit a reviewer.
When you take completed your review, click the greenSubmit this Report button at the bottom of the Review card. This will ship your review to the journal office.
More information about completing your review
Do I need to submit my review all at once?
The organisation will relieve your review as you work. You lot tin navigate abroad from an united nations-submitted review and resume your work at a later date, just please remember to submit your terminal comments by the designated due date.
Can I upload my review as an zipper?
Delight enter all comments in the text boxes provided. If y'all have any supporting documents to include with your review, yous may upload them to the card.
Tin can a postdoctoral researcher or someone else help me with the review?
Yes. If yous received assistance with your review, explicitly state this in the Review card as part of your confidential comments to the editor. Exist certain to include the proper name of the person who assisted with the review.
Who will see my review?
Editors and PLOS staff will exist able to view your review comments in the completed Review bill of fare. Authors and whatsoever other reviewers on the manuscript will see via the decision letter but the comments yous enter regarding the manuscript's overall suitability for PLOS Biology, the quality of the statistical assay, and whether it adheres to standards for data availability.
Will I be notified of the determination?
When a conclusion is made, yous will be notified by email.
Reviewing a Revision
If you are invited to comment on a revised version of a manuscript you previously reviewed, you will receive some other invitation by email. If yous accept, you lot will receive a new Review card. The card will contain the same questions every bit for the previous version of the manuscript. Y'all tin view the report y'all previously submitted in the Review History department at the bottom of the card.
On theResponse to Reviewers bill of fare, you can read the authors' response to reviewers. Depending on how the authors' response has been provided, you volition be able to read the comments direct on the card or admission them in a downloadable file. This card volition also contain the prior determination letter(s) besides equally a version of the authors' revised manuscript with changes highlighted in the document.
You lot can compare two versions of a DOC or DOCX manuscript file by using theVersions tool in the navigation bar above the manuscript. You can besides compare information entered on the submission cards.
Notation that the versioning tool cannot be used to compare PDF to Physician/DOCX submissions. Also, if the previous manuscript was submitted as a PDF, figures and supporting information files will not be comparable on the Figures and Supporting Information cards. To view and compare these items, click the Downloads push to access the previous PDF.
- Now Viewing refers to the electric current version of the manuscript or submission menu
- Compare Withrefers to the older version of the manuscript or submission card that you are comparison against the current version
The versions window will highlight all deleted text in red highlights and all new text in green. ClickX to exit the tool.
Which version is which?
Version numbering starts at R0.0 for inquiry manufactures, and is triggered when the author submits the initial submission.
| R0 | Initial submission of research article |
| R0.1 | Manuscript submitted with additional information for the peer review process |
| R0.2, R0.three, R0.4, etc. | When a full submission goes through the technical check procedure, the version number increases incrementally depending on how many times the submission is returned to the author to make any changes in preparation for peer review. |
| R1.0 | Manuscript revised and resubmitted subsequently receiving its kickoff revise decision |
| R1.one, R1.2, etc. | When a revised submission goes through the technical cheque process, the version number increases incrementally depending on how many times the revised submission is returned to the author to make any changes. |
Source: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/s/aperta-user-guide-for-reviewers
0 Response to "When Should a Reviewer Decline an Invitation to Review an Article With Plos One Journal"
Post a Comment